We read with great interest the data presented by Lewicki et al [
[1]
] regarding shifts in urology care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors report a nearly 20% decrease in urology emergency room visits during March 2020, with an estimated 23% decrease in volume for nonobstructing stones. They note that there were no significant predictors of change in inpatient volume, even when correcting for hospital academic status, urban/rural status, or insurance makeup, perhaps suggesting that patient-specific factors related to the pandemic are driving the changes in volume observed.During the pandemic, we were similarly motivated to understand patient care trends with respect to the decrease in emergency room volumes observed, particularly for stone disease [
[2]
]. Using a digital ethnographic, mixed-methods approach, we used the popular social media discussion board Reddit to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on decision-making related to kidney stones on the r/KidneyStones subforum (www.reddit.com/r/KidneyStones/). We designated posts as either pre-COVID (published January 1–February 29, 2020) or COVID (March 1–June 1, 2020). We applied classic thematic analysis and natural language processing methodology to identify drivers of kidney stone decision-making among patients on this forum. We found that the COVID cohort expressed a higher degree of anxiety surrounding in-person encounters and greater reluctance regarding procedural interventions, with many patients opting instead for at-home, conservative treatment beyond clinical guidelines, reserving emergency department visits for almost exclusively larger stones, highlighting a tendency to postpone consultations that might have serious long-term sequelae [Jiang T, Osadchiy V, Weinberger JM, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient preferences and decision-making for symptomatic urolithiasis. J Endourol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.1141.
[3]
]. In fact, the mean stone size among those reporting visits to the emergency department increased from 5.1 to 10.5 mm.The downstream impact on health care utilization caused by the pandemic remains an open question and one that is understudied because of the recency of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lewicki et al [
[1]
] provide a valuable real-world insight that highlights the changes that many clinicians observed first-hand. Our study adds another dimension to these discussions by using a Big Data approach to assess drivers of patient decision-making.Provided that telehealth is already an established mode for health care delivery after the outbreak of COVID-19, it will be interesting to see if these trends persist and in what way this adoption of telehealth and more widespread SARS-CoV-2 vaccination will shape the landscape of urology care.
Conflicts of interest: Sriram V. Eleswarapu is a consultant for Metuchen Pharmaceuticals. Tommy Jiang and Vadim Osadchiy have nothing to disclose.
References
- Estimating the impact of COVID-19 on urology: data from a large nationwide cohort.Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021; 25: 52-56
Jiang T, Osadchiy V, Weinberger JM, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient preferences and decision-making for symptomatic urolithiasis. J Endourol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.1141.
- Decision making and treatment options in endourology post-coronavirus disease 2019—adapting to the future.Curr Opin Urol. 2021; 31: 109-114
Article info
Publication history
Published online: May 26, 2021
Accepted:
March 26,
2021
Identification
Copyright
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) | How you can reuse 
Elsevier's open access license policy
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Estimating the Impact of COVID-19 on Urology: Data from a Large Nationwide CohortEuropean Urology Open ScienceVol. 25
- PreviewThe impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on urology worldwide has been the subject of frequent speculation, but population-level estimates on changes in urology care are sparsely reported. Here, we use newly released data from a large USA-based cohort to provide further insight into the impact of the pandemic on our field. For a final cohort of 900,900 patient encounters in 418 hospitals, we describe an approximately 20% decrease in urology-specific emergency room (ER) visits (19.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.4–21.5%), admissions to a urology service (19.3%, 95% CI 13.7–24.9%), and ambulatory urology surgeries (22.9%, 95% CI 13.2–32.6%) during March 2020 relative to baseline.
- Full-Text
- Preview
- Reply to Tommy Jiang, Sriram V. Eleswarapu, and Vadim Osadchiy’s Letter to the Editor re: Patrick Lewicki, Spyridon P. Basourakos, Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh, et al. Estimating the Impact of COVID-19 on Urology: Data from a Large Nationwide Cohort. Eur Urol Open Sci 2021;25:52–6. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Kidney Stones: Matching Online Discussions to Real World DataEuropean Urology Open ScienceVol. 29
- PreviewWe read with great interest about the work by Jiang et al, which connects our findings from a large administrative database [1] to data from a patient forum on kidney stones [2]. Their study provides a plausible explanation for our findings and helps in understanding the various factors underpinning the decrease in urologic care observed across all US geographic regions in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Investigating epidemiologic phenomena using a variety of different sources, from “big data” analyses to patient reports and single-institution experiences, improves our ability to refine hypotheses, with the referenced work as a strong example.
- Full-Text
- Preview
